Download | Duration: 00:14:30

  This link is segment 1 of a six segment radio show broadcast May 1, 2010 on WIFL, Frank Talk 104.3 FM for the Liberty Works radio network.  David Alan Carmichael takes a critical look at the text and implications of 'domestic partner' legislation proposed in Florida.  This is a blast of 'critical thinking' necessary for anybody who wants to test whether they have been exposed to the pandemic of dementia that is sweeping North America.  David examines the legislation on a constitutional basis, a biblical basis, and on the basis of right versus wrong.  This first play button will play the opening segment that discusses some interesting items in some alternative news sources.  Segments 2 through 6 are much closer on point with the topic of the day:

Segment 2:  http://www.faithfreedoms.org/audio/podcasts/wifl1may2010carmichael2.mp3 Senate Bill 104 spells out that beastiality is unlawful.  Why would the legislature have to spell out that beastiality is a civil crime when it is self evidence that it is a crime against nature?  An article saying that animals are denied the right to privacy bodes ill for Americans who are steadily yeilding to having ancient wrongs become rights.

Segment 3:  http://www.faithfreedoms.org/audio/podcasts/wifl1may2010carmichael3.mp3  Do the precepts of Marx undermine the family?  Does Florida Joint Resolution 84 undermine Floridian's Bill of Rights?  Should all natural persons, even foreigners, own Florida property without restriction?  What do Floridians need to know about law regarding real property, inheritance, and foreigners?
 
Segment 4:  http://www.faithfreedoms.org/audio/podcasts/wifl1may2010carmichael4.mp3 Is the Domestic Partnership bill (SB232) a deliberate undermining of the Florida Constitution?  David The Domestic Partnership bill is reviewed in depth.   

Segment 5:  http://www.faithfreedoms.org/audio/podcasts/wifl1may2010carmichael5.mp3  What is the point of the legislation?  Is it to create a mechanism to 'make a partner pay' in the case of hurt feelings?  David gives his common-man definition of 'domestic partnership' as it relates to the bill.  Will partnering with a dog be the next wrong to be called a right?  What is 'right' regarding marriage versus domestic partnership?

Segment 6:  http://www.faithfreedoms.org/audio/podcasts/wifl1may2010carmichael6.mp3 Passing Domestic Partnership legislation has far reaching consequences.  It dismantles law.  Where does the Bible forecast this pandemic of dementia?